Snowflake Comparison¶
DuckDB Semantic Views is modeled on Snowflake’s CREATE SEMANTIC VIEW SQL DDL interface. If you have used Snowflake semantic views, much of the syntax and concept model will be familiar. This page maps the key concepts and calls out the differences.
Note
Snowflake has two distinct interfaces for semantic views: the SQL DDL (CREATE SEMANTIC VIEW)
and the older YAML spec (CREATE SEMANTIC VIEW FROM YAML, designed for Cortex Analyst).
All comparisons on this page target the SQL DDL interface only. The YAML spec includes
concepts like time_dimensions, custom_instructions, and sample_values that
exist to serve the AI SQL generation layer and have no equivalent in the SQL DDL.
Concept Mapping¶
Concept |
Snowflake SQL DDL |
DuckDB Semantic Views |
|---|---|---|
Define a semantic view |
|
|
Expression checking |
Each expression is compiled at |
Each dimension, fact and metric is bound at |
Table declarations |
|
|
Relationships |
|
|
Dimensions |
|
|
Metrics (measures) |
|
|
View variables |
|
The same |
Reusable row-level expressions |
|
|
Metric composition |
Derived metrics (metric referencing other metrics) |
Derived metrics (same pattern) |
Semi-additive metrics |
|
|
Window function metrics |
|
|
Metadata annotations |
|
|
Access modifiers |
|
Same rule: |
Materializations / pre-aggregation |
Not part of Snowflake’s |
|
Query interface |
|
The same SEMANTIC_VIEW(…) construct, standard SQL with |
Wildcard selection |
|
|
View inspection |
|
DESCRIBE SEMANTIC VIEW ( |
List views |
|
SHOW SEMANTIC VIEWS, |
Terse view listing |
|
|
Column listing |
|
|
Filter by scope |
|
|
Retrieve DDL text |
|
GET_DDL, with either spelling of the object type |
Alter a view |
|
ALTER SEMANTIC VIEW (RENAME TO, SET and UNSET of COMMENT and MAX_STALENESS, SET TAG, UNSET TAG) |
Drop a view |
|
Syntax Alignment¶
The DDL syntax is intentionally close to Snowflake’s. The clause order (TABLES, RELATIONSHIPS, VARIABLES, FACTS, DIMENSIONS, METRICS) matches Snowflake, and the entry syntax within each clause follows the same pattern.
Note
Syntax conveniences for porting.
Added in version 0.11.0.
Several Snowflake spellings are accepted to reduce friction when porting DDL: the
table alias in TABLES is optional (TABLES (orders PRIMARY KEY (id)), matching
Snowflake’s [alias AS] table); a view-level COMMENT = '...' may appear in the
trailing position after the last clause; PUBLIC is accepted on dimensions;
WITH SYNONYMS (...) is accepted without the =; and DESC SEMANTIC VIEW is
accepted as an abbreviation of DESCRIBE SEMANTIC VIEW. See
CREATE SEMANTIC VIEW.
Added in version 0.18.0.
Snowflake DDL now pastes as written: AS before TABLES is optional;
LABELS = (FILTER) may sit between a member’s name and its AS
(o.is_large LABELS = (FILTER) AS o.amount > 100), where Snowflake puts it;
and GET_DDL takes 'SEMANTIC VIEW' as well as 'SEMANTIC_VIEW'.
-- Snowflake writes no AS keyword before the body clauses.
CREATE SEMANTIC VIEW analytics
TABLES (
o AS orders,
c AS customers PRIMARY KEY (id)
)
RELATIONSHIPS (
order_customer AS o(customer_id) REFERENCES c
)
DIMENSIONS (
c.customer_name AS c.name,
o.region AS o.region
)
METRICS (
o.revenue AS SUM(o.amount)
);
-- AS is optional: the Snowflake form above also works.
CREATE SEMANTIC VIEW analytics AS
TABLES (
o AS orders PRIMARY KEY (id),
c AS customers PRIMARY KEY (id)
)
RELATIONSHIPS (
order_customer AS o(customer_id) REFERENCES c
)
DIMENSIONS (
c.customer_name AS c.name,
o.region AS o.region
)
METRICS (
o.revenue AS SUM(o.amount)
);
Key Differences¶
Primary Key Declarations¶
Note
PRIMARY KEY declarations in the TABLES clause are optional at the syntax
level, but any table used as the target of a RELATIONSHIPS entry must declare
a PRIMARY KEY or UNIQUE key in its own TABLES entry. An explicit column
list on the referencing side (REFERENCES c(id)) does not replace that
declaration: it has to name columns the target already declares as its
PRIMARY KEY or as one of its UNIQUE keys.
Both systems take the key from the semantic view definition rather than from the
physical table. Snowflake’s CREATE SEMANTIC VIEW reference describes a
referenced column as “a column identified with the PRIMARY KEY or UNIQUE
constraint in the logical table definition”, and
DuckDB Semantic Views applies the same rule. In both, a PRIMARY KEY in a
semantic view is a logical assertion you make about the data, not a physical
constraint imported from the catalog.
Changed in version 0.10.0: Automatic PK inference from DuckDB’s duckdb_constraints() catalog was removed
(breaking). Earlier releases imported a native table’s physical PRIMARY KEY at
CREATE time when the TABLES entry declared none; this fallback is gone. You
must now declare the key explicitly, whether the table is a native DuckDB table or an
external source. Migration: add a PRIMARY KEY (...) (or UNIQUE (...)) clause to
any TABLES entry that previously relied on the auto-fallback.
Tip
This uniform rule is convenient for data engineers using DuckDB with Iceberg,
Parquet, CSV, or Postgres sources: those catalogs never surfaced PK/FK metadata
through duckdb_constraints() anyway, so declaring keys in the TABLES clause was
always required for them. Now native DuckDB tables follow the same explicit-declaration
rule, so there is one consistent model regardless of data source.
-- Every table used as a join target declares its key explicitly,
-- regardless of whether it is a native DuckDB table or an external source.
CREATE SEMANTIC VIEW analytics AS
TABLES (
o AS orders PRIMARY KEY (id),
c AS customers PRIMARY KEY (id)
)
RELATIONSHIPS (
order_customer AS o(customer_id) REFERENCES c
)
DIMENSIONS (c.name AS c.name)
METRICS (o.revenue AS SUM(o.amount));
If a relationship’s target table declares neither key, the extension rejects the
definition at CREATE time, whether or not the REFERENCES side lists columns.
With c AS customers declared without a key in the example above, the error is:
Parser Error: Table 'c' has no PRIMARY KEY declared but is referenced by FK in 'o'.
Add PRIMARY KEY (cols) or UNIQUE (cols) to the TABLES clause for c. (v0.10.0:
physical-catalog PK auto-inference removed -- see CHANGELOG.)
This prevents the extension from synthesizing an incorrect JOIN ON clause.
Query Interface¶
Both systems query a semantic view in three ways: by name with standard SQL, passing each metric to AGG; with the SEMANTIC_VIEW(...) construct; and, in DuckDB only, with the semantic_view() table function the construct turns into.
-- Both: standard SQL over the view by name, with AGG around each metric
SELECT region, AGG(revenue)
FROM analytics
GROUP BY region;
-- Both: the SEMANTIC_VIEW construct. The view name and the dimension /
-- metric references are bare identifiers (not string literals), and there
-- is no comma between the view name and the DIMENSIONS / METRICS keywords.
SELECT * FROM SEMANTIC_VIEW(
analytics
DIMENSIONS orders.region
METRICS orders.revenue
);
-- DuckDB: the same query as a table function with named lists
SELECT * FROM semantic_view('analytics',
dimensions := ['orders.region'],
metrics := ['orders.revenue']
);
The standard-SQL form follows Snowflake’s rules: GROUP BY expressions are the dimensions, a metric is passed to AGG (MIN, MAX and ANY_VALUE of a metric mean the same), other aggregates are ad-hoc metrics, WHERE refers to dimensions and facts, HAVING to aggregated metrics, and the block that reads the view has no joins, window functions, QUALIFY, PIVOT or qualified correlated references. See How to Query a Semantic View with Standard SQL. Two differences come from DuckDB rather than from semantic views: a name that is also a table, a view or a CTE in scope reads that, not the semantic view; and SELECT * is refused, where the construct’s SELECT * FROM SEMANTIC_VIEW(...) is not.
Cardinality Inference¶
Both systems infer cardinality from constraints. In DuckDB Semantic Views, cardinality is inferred from PRIMARY KEY and UNIQUE declarations in the TABLES clause:
If the FK columns on the “from” side match a PK or UNIQUE constraint, the relationship is one-to-one.
Otherwise, the relationship is many-to-one (the default).
The extension uses inferred cardinality for fan trap detection.
What an Expression May Reference¶
Both systems scope a member expression to its own logical table. Snowflake’s validation rules state that expressions can refer to base table columns or other expressions on the same logical table, and that they “cannot refer to base table columns from other tables”. To reach another table you declare a relationship, define a fact on the source table, and refer to that fact from the connected table. The rule here is the same.
A named fact on another table – Snowflake’s supported cross-table form –
is at parity: the fact’s expression is inlined at its reference site and its
table is joined, so o.net_total AS SUM(o.amount - c.cust_discount) computes
over the joined relation. One safety rule is added on top of Snowflake’s, for a
hazard its single-grain model does not face here: if the fact’s table fans the
referencing member’s – a fact on a child table, reached across a one-to-many
edge – joining it would multiply the member’s rows, so the query is rejected
with a fan trap error rather than answered with an inflated aggregate. See
Reference a Fact on Another Table.
A raw column of another table (o.margin AS o.amount - c.discount) is
rejected at CREATE in both systems, with an error naming the rule and
pointing at the fact-based alternative. A qualifier that names no declared table
at all is left to DuckDB, which is the right place for a struct path, a bound
parameter, or a typo to be resolved.
Changed in version 0.12.0: Before, the definition was accepted and the reference surfaced at query time as a DuckDB unknown-alias error – the same rule, enforced later.
Derived metrics are unaffected: a metric that references metrics on other tables
(m AS t1.metric_1 + t2.metric_2) is supported in both systems, and is
computed per grain – see Metric Grain below.
Reported Data Types¶
Snowflake populates the data_type column of
SHOW SEMANTIC DIMENSIONS /
METRICS / FACTS
(and the DATA_TYPE rows of DESCRIBE) with the
member’s actual data type.
Changed in version 0.14.0: data_type is populated again. It had been empty for every view created
since v0.10.0; views created in that window report their types too, with no
need to re-create them.
The same holds here. The type is not stored at CREATE; it is worked out
when the SHOW / DESCRIBE command runs, by preparing the query
semantic_view() would run for the member and
reading its column type. So data_type follows the current source columns, and it
is always the type a query returns for that member:
DuckDB type names. Types are spelled the way DuckDB spells them (
VARCHAR,BIGINT,DECIMAL(38,2),VARCHAR[]), not as Snowflake would (TEXT,NUMBER(38,0)).DuckDB’s own types.
SUMover an integer column is aHUGEINT, andENUM/STRUCT/MAPcolumns keep their types, both in whatsemantic_view()returns and indata_type.When a member cannot be typed – its source table or column was dropped or renamed after
CREATE–data_typeis empty for that member, and the command still succeeds for the rest. Querying the member reports the underlying error. The same goes for a metric that cannot be queried on its own because it would aggregate across a fan-out (see How to Diagnose and Fix Fan Traps): itsdata_typeis empty, and querying it reports the fan trap.Over a temporary table, or a table changed in your open transaction, members are typed as
semantic_view()reads them there: the command runs in your session and transaction.PRIVATE members are typed too, though they cannot be queried directly.
Members that read a variable are typed with the variable taken as its default, or as a
NULLof its type when it has no default, so no value is needed.SUM(amount * multiplier)with aDOUBLEmultiplier isDOUBLE. See VARIABLES.Role-played members – on a table that several relationships point at – are typed too, although querying one needs a metric whose
USINGnames the role. The type is the same whichever role is used.
The cross-view forms (SHOW SEMANTIC METRICS without IN, or with
IN SCHEMA) type the members of every view, so they take longer as the catalog
grows: roughly a millisecond or two per view.
Metric Grain¶
Changed in version 0.12.0.
Like Snowflake, each metric is computed at the grain of its own logical table. When a query’s metrics sit at different grains – a metric on a parent table alongside one on the base table, two metrics on different child tables, or a single derived metric fusing two grains – each is aggregated separately over its own table and the results are joined on the queried dimensions. A metric on a parent table is therefore not multiplied by the number of child rows, and a parent row with no children is not dropped.
Before v0.12.0 the generated SQL was always anchored FROM <base table>, so
these queries were rejected with a fan trap error rather than silently inflated.
Changed in version 0.14.0: This now holds for a query with a single grain too. A metric on a child of
the base table, queried on its own, is aggregated from the child table and
joined out to the dimensions, as in Snowflake – it used to be computed over
FROM <base table> LEFT JOIN <child>. So a child row whose foreign key is
NULL is counted under a NULL dimension value, a parent with no children
has no row (or a NULL child metric when a parent-table metric brings its
row in), and a metric’s value never depends on what else is queried. See
Orphan Rows and Parents With No Children. Only a query whose metrics all live on the
base table is still a single base-anchored SELECT; there the base table
is every metric’s own table, so the two coincide.
Four boundaries apply:
A dimension below a metric’s grain (
SUM(customers.balance)grouped by an order-grain dimension) is rejected in both systems. Snowflake’s rule is that the logical table for the dimension must be related to the logical table for the metric and must have “an equal or lower level of granularity than the logical table for the metric”; the extension’sfan trap detectederror enforces the same condition. Per-grain aggregation does not make these answerable – the metric’s rows genuinely fan across the dimension’s values, so there is no single correct value per group.A window metric whose inner aggregate lives on a non-base table is computed at its own grain – the inner aggregation is anchored at that table (a parent or a child of the base table), so it is neither inflated nor thinned by a base-table join. Window metrics whose inner aggregates sit at different grains still error, as those grains would need joining before the window runs. The exception is a pair joined one-to-one, where nothing fans out: it is answered from the base table instead (see What Is Still Refused, and Why).
An active semi-additive metric snapshots at its own grain, whether it is the query’s only grain or one of several: the
RANK()runs over the metric’s own table rather than a base-anchored join, so the winning snapshot row is not added once per base-table row. ANON ADDITIVE BYdimension declared on another logical table is joined in so its ordering still binds. This matches Snowflake: probed directly, it returns each metric at its own grain, with the snapshot selection happening inside the semi-additive metric’s own-grain aggregation rather than over the joined row set. Snowflake also accepts aNON ADDITIVE BYdimension declared on another logical table, provided the reference is qualified (NON ADDITIVE BY (s.report_date)); the bare form resolves only within the metric’s own table. Both forms are accepted here too.Multi-grain queries reaching a role-played table are computed when every metric’s
USINGnames a role: each grain CTE joins its metrics’ relationship under its scoped alias and groups by the dimension bound to it, as the single-grain path already did. A metric withoutUSINGmakes the query ambiguous, as in Snowflake, since a grain CTE would otherwise choose among the relationship instances by declaration order. This covers only a queried dimension’s own table – a WHERE member on a role-played table, a metric aggregated at one, or a table reachable only through one still error. A definition that merely declares role-playing does not lose per-grain emission: the test is what the query reaches, so unrelated grains in the same view are computed normally. The one pairing that still declines is a role-played dimension queried together with an active semi-additive metric: a snapshot group cannot carry a role, so the two grains would bind different instances of the same dimension and the outer join would compare them.
USING RELATIONSHIPS¶
Both systems support USING on metrics to select which relationship path a metric traverses. The syntax is identical:
METRICS (
f.departures USING (dep_airport) AS COUNT(*)
)
Added in version 0.18.0: Snowflake’s multi-path behaviour: metrics with different USING paths to
one table can be queried together with a dimension on it. Each metric is
grouped through its own path and the results are merged on the queried
dimensions, so a group one path never reaches shows NULL for that
path’s metrics. A derived metric over such metrics is computed from the
merged components. Snowflake’s documented form,
f.departures USING (dep_airport) AS f.flight_count over a plain
f.flight_count AS COUNT(*), works too: a metric can name other metrics
on its own table.
Both systems refuse a dimension on a role-played table when a metric in the
query names no path to it. Both also accept a dimension beyond the
role-played table (regions reached from airports), taking the path
from the metric’s USING and following the single relationship onward.
Facts Query Mode¶
Added in version 0.6.0.
Both systems allow facts to be queried directly as row-level columns. In Snowflake, facts appear in the SEMANTIC_VIEW() query function. In DuckDB Semantic Views, use the facts parameter:
-- DuckDB: query facts as row-level columns
SELECT * FROM SEMANTIC_VIEW(analytics
FACTS region, net_price
);
Warning
In both systems, facts and metrics cannot be combined in the same query. Use FACTS or METRICS, not both.
Changed in version 0.18.0: Both systems now read a member in the clause it is listed in, following Snowflake’s 2026_07 behaviour change. A dimension listed in FACTS is read row by row, a fact listed in DIMENSIONS is grouped on, and FACTS with DIMENSIONS in one query is refused (see Cannot query facts with dimensions).
Semi-Additive and Window Metrics¶
Added in version 0.6.0.
Both systems support semi-additive metrics (NON ADDITIVE BY) and window function metrics (OVER with PARTITION BY EXCLUDING). The syntax is aligned:
-- Semi-additive: last balance per account, summed across customers
METRICS (
a.balance NON ADDITIVE BY (date_dim) AS SUM(a.amount)
)
-- Window: rolling average excluding region from partition
METRICS (
o.avg_qty AS AVG(total_qty) OVER (PARTITION BY EXCLUDING region ORDER BY month)
)
Like Snowflake, the default (ascending) direction selects the latest snapshot and DESC selects the earliest (see How to Use Semi-Additive Metrics).
The behavioral differences are:
NON ADDITIVE BYdimensions must be declared in the view’sDIMENSIONSclause. Snowflake validates against its own catalog.Window metrics and
NON ADDITIVE BYcannot be combined on the same metric (mutually exclusive).NULL keys in a non-additive dimension: the default NULLS placement follows the direction (
ASC→NULLS LAST,DESC→NULLS FIRST), matching DuckDB/Snowflake. UnderNULLS LASTa NULL key never wins (the latest/earliest real snapshot is selected); underNULLS FIRSTa NULL key wins. Add an explicitNULLS LASTto exclude NULL keys regardless of direction.Window metrics cannot be mixed with aggregate metrics in the same query.
Materializations¶
Added in version 0.7.0.
Snowflake’s CREATE SEMANTIC VIEW SQL DDL does not include a materializations or pre-aggregation concept. Pre-aggregation in Snowflake is handled through separate materialized views.
DuckDB Semantic Views introduces a MATERIALIZATIONS clause that declares mappings from pre-aggregated tables to the dimensions and metrics they cover. When a query exactly matches a materialization, the extension routes to the pre-aggregated table instead of expanding raw sources. See How to Use Materializations for details.
Transactional DDL¶
Added in version 0.8.0.
This is a divergence. In Snowflake, each DDL statement executes as a separate transaction: a DDL statement issued inside an open transaction implicitly commits that transaction first, then runs and commits on its own. A CREATE, ALTER or DROP SEMANTIC VIEW therefore cannot be rolled back there.
DuckDB Semantic Views runs these statements inside the caller’s transaction, the way DuckDB runs its own DDL. BEGIN ... ROLLBACK discards an uncommitted CREATE, ALTER or DROP SEMANTIC VIEW, and a COMMIT publishes the DDL together with any data changes in the same transaction.
Some DuckDB-specific details to know before you build on it:
Reads inside an open transaction,
DESCRIBE SEMANTIC VIEWand theSHOW SEMANTIC ...family included, see that transaction’s uncommittedCREATE,ALTERandDROP. Other connections see them once you commit.CREATE SEMANTIC VIEW IF NOT EXISTScannot fully absorb a race between two connections both running it against the same database at the same moment – one will succeed and the other will see a constraint or commit-conflict error. On a single connection,IF NOT EXISTSis reliable.The non-
IF EXISTSDROPandALTERforms raisesemantic view '<name>' does not existwhen the view is absent at check time, instead of silently no-opping. The existence check and the write are atomic only inside an explicit transaction; under autocommit a drop committed by another writer in the window between them is not detected. Wrap the DDL inBEGIN ... COMMITwhen you need the check to be reliable under concurrency.
See Transactional DDL and Known Limitations for the full mechanism and worked examples.
Schema Scoping and Name Resolution¶
Both systems scope a semantic view to a schema, so analytics.sales and staging.sales are two different views and a <schema>. qualifier on CREATE / DROP / ALTER decides which one a statement means.
Where they differ is how an unqualified reference is resolved. Snowflake uses the session’s current database and schema; DuckDB Semantic Views uses DuckDB’s own rule, the session search_path – the first schema on it holding a view of that name wins, so SET search_path = 'staging' makes a bare sales mean staging.sales. A view that is the only one of its name resolves whether or not its schema is on the path.
A name that exists only in schemas off the path is a miss. The error names the schemas it does live in and the path that was searched, rather than reporting a bare “does not exist” for a view SHOW SEMANTIC VIEWS plainly lists.
Two DuckDB-specific consequences:
Identifiers are case-insensitive on both sides of the dot, quoted or not, following DuckDB rather than Snowflake –
analytics.sales,ANALYTICS.SALESand"Analytics"."Sales"all name the same view. Snowflake would treat the quoted spellings as case-sensitive. See CREATE SEMANTIC VIEW for the full identifier rule.One catalog per database. A
<database>.prefix that names a database other than the session’s is rejected: the extension manages a single catalog, in the database it was loaded into.
Feature Parity Notes¶
Snowflake CREATE SEMANTIC VIEW features that are commonly asked about, and where each one stands. Rows marked Supported have since landed; the rest are unimplemented, out of scope, or not planned, with the reason given:
Snowflake Feature |
Status |
|---|---|
Standard SQL over the view by name – |
Supported, with Snowflake’s rules: |
Pre-aggregation |
Supported, written the same way in the SEMANTIC_VIEW(…) construct, and as the where_clause named parameter of |
Query-time scalar expressions – |
Supported. An item may be an expression, in the construct and in a |
Named filters – |
Supported. |
Tags – |
Supported, with Snowflake’s placement and syntax. Tags are stored with the view and shown as a |
Cortex Analyst metadata – |
Accepted and stored, with Snowflake’s syntax, so Snowflake DDL pastes as written. None of it changes a query: there is no Cortex Analyst to read it, no search service to call, and no automatic refresh for |
View variables – |
Supported, with Snowflake’s rules: an entry is |
Column-level security |
Out of scope; DuckDB handles access control |
|
Not planned; standard equi-joins cover most use cases |
|
Not planned; these are Snowflake-catalog or Cortex-specific and have no DuckDB equivalent |
A Note on Snowflake’s YAML Spec¶
Snowflake’s YAML-based semantic view definition (CREATE SEMANTIC VIEW FROM YAML) is a separate interface designed for Cortex Analyst, Snowflake’s AI SQL generation layer. The YAML spec includes concepts that do not exist in the SQL DDL:
time_dimensionswith granularity controls (the SQL DDL uses regular dimensions withdate_trunc())
DuckDB Semantic Views supports YAML definition import (FROM YAML) and export (READ_YAML_FROM_SEMANTIC_VIEW()), but these use the extension’s own YAML schema – not Snowflake’s Cortex Analyst YAML spec. Where the SQL DDL carries Cortex Analyst metadata, the YAML uses Snowflake’s field names for it (sample_values, is_enum, cortex_search_service, max_staleness, module_custom_instructions, verified_queries); see YAML Definition Format. The DuckDB YAML format is a serialization of the same model used by the SQL DDL (tables, relationships, variables, facts, dimensions, metrics, materializations). It is designed for version control, migration, and sharing – not for AI prompt tuning. Comparisons against Snowflake YAML-spec-only features remain not applicable.
See How to Import and Export YAML Definitions for the DuckDB YAML workflow.